1/7/2024 0 Comments Intrepid nation decipher chatThere is no sophisticated malware or breach to detect. Focusing on physical damages and overt military exercises means attacks get missed. That sounds a lot like what is currently happening, with different tools being used in variety of ways to spread false information. Nye wrote that hybrid warfare blends conventional weapons, economic coercion, information operations, and cyber attacks. "More a support weapon than a means to clinch victory.” New Attack Tactics “Thus far, however, cyber weapons seem to be oversold, more useful for signaling or sowing confusion than for physical destruction,” Joseph Nye, former assistant secretary of defense and current professor at Harvard University, recently wrote in a column on Project Syndicate. The combination of traditional methods and digital attacks lets the attackers still maintain a degree of deniability. Organizations may still be thinking about physical damage or impact, but attackers appear to have moved on to less overt activities that can still sow confusion and cause chaos. military retaliation in the event of a cyber-attack. It’s possible mass destruction and chaos Panetta warned about hasn’t come to pass ( yet!) because nation-state attackers fear U.S. The list of recent nation-state attacks-which includes the Russians going after Yahoo and the Chinese in the breach of Office of Personnel Management-show that actors are targeting commercial networks and public infrastructure using a variety of different methods. Malware can take production plants offline, shut down the electric grid and cause power outages, and disrupt operations by compromising safety controllers in industrial control systems. Hybrid warfare blends conventional weapons, economic coercion, information operations, and cyber attacks.Ĭyber-attacks can have physical impact, but many of them tend to be more disruptive than destructive. They could contaminate the water supply in major cities, or shut down the power grid across large parts of the country,” Panetta said at the time. “They could, for example, derail passenger trains, or even more dangerous, derail passenger trains loaded with lethal chemicals. Panetta raised the spectre of a “cyber-Pearl Harbor,” an audacious digital attack with far-ranging consequences in the physical world, in a 2012 speech at New York’s Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum. Cyber-War Fearsįormer Defense Secretary Leon E. The Soviets were really good at information warfare during the Cold War and the Russians today are proving to be quite adept at using the Internet to speed up the spread of false information without being obvious about their activities. The latest revelations-and indictments-about the Russian involvement with the 2016 United States presidential election highlights how digital attacks can be used against intangible targets, such as faith in social and traditional media, and confidence in the integrity of elections.ĭisinformation is the latest weapon in the arsenal. So long as the default assumption focuses on things exploding, we remain unprepared to deal with the fallout from information warfare. But the latest nation-state attacks appear to be aiming for the intangibles-with economic, political, and social impact. Hollywood scriptwriters and political leaders paint vivid pictures showing the dangers of cyber-war, with degraded communications networks, equipment sabotage, and malfunctioning infrastructure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |